Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 27 Jul 2007 07:39:18 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I'm sure you will hear from Brain, who is to cleaning like Neptune was
to water and from Mr. "It depends" when he arises from the mist of
Mountain Dew, but in the interim a little clean humor.
All the goodness of your equipment and process controls establishes
capability assessment tools of the "how". In lieu of any prime
directives, the default scenario requires performing Ionic Contamination
Testing and archiving the test data results to establish an auditable
artifact for verification of process control and lot acceptance.
Dewey
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of - bogert
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 4:21 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Cleaning Machine ResistivityTesting Versus Ionic
Contamination Testing
July 26, 2007
I have a question to pose for Tech Net folks based on my limited
experience
in this area. If I have a cleaning machine that includes a built in
continuous test for rinse water or wash water resistivity, do I need to
then
still do an independent ionic contamination test using the standard DI
Water/Alcohol Ionic Contamination test? If so why? What is the
technical
relationship between the two tests? Can one equate the cleaning machine
Resistivity Test results to the J-STD-001 cleanliness limits or the
results
of the Ionic Contamination test? If so, how? Have folks experience
shown
that one can pass the cleaning machine Resistivity Test and still fail
Ionic
Contamination Test? Why?
Doug, Pauls, as the worlds (wow) expert in this area, what do you say
(It
depends)???.
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|