TECHNET Archives

July 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 Jul 2007 18:03:13 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (65 lines)
Hi Dave!

Process development with BGAs, particularly tight pitch ones, is always painful--especially if you can't afford to lose ANY parts.

You don't say whether you are Pb-free or not. The 215C sounds adequate for SnPb, but not standard Pb-free alloys.  Most BGAs are now Pb-free, and attaching them with SnPb can be extremely difficult to get right.  Search TechNet archives for more on that subject.

Measuring the device temperature is a reasonable starting point.  You can also monitor the temperature of the circuit board adjacent to the part.  If both are in a reasonable range for reflow, then you try a part and then use XRAY or cross sectioning to see if the joints collapsed properly and appear to be reliable.  If you can't destroy anything, then you measure the amount of joint collapse due to the reflow process, carefully examine the visually inspectable joints, and XRAY the one's you can't see.  The XRAY exam works much better if you don't use completely round pads to attach to--distorted joints are easy to see and clearly indicate wetting.

Good Luck!

Wayne Thayer 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Tremmel
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 5:22 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] microBGA rework

Hello gurus of the Technet,

 

 

We are trying to rework some microBGAs but there is not enough room under the parts for a thermocouple and drilling a hole through the board is not an option at this point.  

 

We are placing a thermocouple on the top of the components being reworked and covering it with Kapton tape and the thermal profile we are using is maxing-out at 215° C.

 

 

Does anyone have experience measuring the component temperature and not the solder temperature and would they mind sharing their results?  Are we asking for field defects because we are not measuring the solder temperature?

 

 

Thank you in advance,

 

David Tremmel

(847) 858-5540 - Cell

 


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2