TECHNET Archives

July 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kane, Joseph E (US SSA)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Kane, Joseph E (US SSA)
Date:
Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:07:29 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (104 lines)
If the sensitive assembly is insulated from the static protective 
work surface, then it's not at equal potential with the operator or
anything else that's grounded around it.  This does in fact violate
the core principle of effective ESD control.

Any wooden supports that we use have metal strips or conductive
tape (like metal plater's tape) wrapped around them to ground them
to the static mat or oven rack.

A grounded operator cannot remove charge from an insulator, because
the charge stays on the surface of the insulator.  If you pick up a
block
of wood with charge on it, the charge stays put.

I don't think that an ionizer is always necessary at a conformal coating
operation.  I've take static field measurements, and can't find any
appreciable charge generation at our conformal coat spray, so we
don't use ionizers in our lines, or ionizing air blowers at conformal
coat.

As always, your mileage may vary.

-Joe


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of - bogert
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 9:51 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] ESD Question Regarding ANSI/ESD S20.20 and use of
cardboard or wood


July 20, 2007

We have an OEM that has an ESD control program in place per the subject 
specification invoked via J-STD-001.  However, my position is that he
does 
not comply with the requirements since during his conformal coating hand

spray process, he places the PWAs ontop of cardboard then sprays them
with 
coating (no ionizer machine is used in the coating area).  Additionally,

sometimes ESD sensitive assemblies are placed on top of cardboard or
wooden 
blocks during the assembly or inspection process.  In all cases when
wood or 
cardboard is used, the wood and cardboard rests ontop of a properly
grounded 
ESD mat, and the operator is grounded via a properly connected wrist
strap.

I maintain that this practice violates the subject specification since
wood 
and cardboard are insulating materials which are not to be used at the 
workstations, and if one took a surface insulation resistance
measurement 
across the wood or cardboard surface, one would obviously not meet the
value 
specified for a properly grounded mat.

I would appreciate any comment on the above, and whether other folks use

wood or cardboard upon which ESD assemblies rest.  How do other folks 
support assemblies during conformal coating or assembly/inspection if
wood 
or cardboard is not used?

If the operator is properly grounded via a wrist strap, would any static

charge that may exist on the cardboard or wood surface dissipate through
the 
wrist strap without damage to the product?  I suspect not otherwise
there 
would be no need to require that the grounded mats be used.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2