Werner,

Exactly and that IS the debate.

Bev

 

________________________________

From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 12:14 PM
To: [log in to unmask]; Bev Christian
Subject: Re: [TN] Question about rework of paste in hole solder joints

 

Hi Bev,
I know you know the difference.
Why the debate? If it is adequate, albeit violating IPC standards,
originally, why should that have changed? 

Werner



**************************************
Get a sneak peak of the all-new AOL at
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour




---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------