EMBEDDEDNET Archives

July 2007

EmbeddedNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Daniel Brandler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
D-50 Embedded Devices Committee Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Daniel Brandler <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 5 Jul 2007 13:30:03 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Denny,

I apologize if I'm stating the obvious, but the EMPF article is not 
clear as to definitions. I hope everyone understands that there is a big 
difference between an IPD as a surface mount device (SMT) and an 
embedded passive component buried within a multilayer PCB or HDI 
substrate. IPDs are great for many applications but we still have to 
route the signals to the surface to connect with the IPD as an SMT device.

One of the advantages of embedded components is that they can be placed 
within the footprint of a BGA. No matter how fine the pitch, the 
impedance matching resistor can always terminate the signal within a 
power or ground plane or as a high aspect ratio series resistor, follow 
the trace wherever it goes.

Daniel Brandler
Ohmega Technologies, Inc.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2