TECHNET Archives

June 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Burtt, Nigel" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Burtt, Nigel
Date:
Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:21:18 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (102 lines)
Agreed. If Nickel from ENIG (possibly the most popular le
Inge



Agreed. If Nickel from ENIG (possibly the most popular lead-free PCB

finish now?) is OK at the component-PCB interface then why are we so

fussy about nickel content in the bulk of the solder joint



Anecdotal evidence that increased nickel content in lead-free baths is

common



Nigel

-----Original Message-----

From: Hernefjord Ingemar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 

Sent: 11 June 2007 12:11

To: TechNet E-Mail Forum; Burtt, Nigel

Subject: RE: [TN] Nickel content in solder



Nigel,



this 0.01 % level is strange. When you solder, you solder on pure Nickel

(e.g. ENIG). The nickel plated pad becomes part of the solder (a IMC).

Now, let's put a nickel ball representing 0.1% of the solder weight into

the solder. And we heat the solder the usual way to solder on a ENIG

board. Will the little nickel ball poison the solder joint? Probably

not. A Sn/Ni intermetalic will grow around the ball, but that won't be

detrimental to the solder joint. Ten little nickel balls, together

representing 0.1% of the solder weight, will that be detrimental? I

guess not. And so on. I have seen large nickel flakes loosen from

(bad)nickel plating and be mixed with the solder and nothing has

happend, at least not in a global solder joint perspective. In analogue

with the said, I can't see why 0.01% or 0.1% makes any difference.

Likewise, if 1 out of 1,000 spheres in the solder paste is Nickel, I

doubt that will matter. Finally, if we anticipate that ALL solder

spheres have 1/1000 of the sphere volume filled with Nickel, will that

be detrimental? Hardly. This is the practical view of things, a

morphologist and/or a metalurgist may have a different view. If you got

a pot of research money, you'll probably find something. Will be

interesting to see what the heavy metal gnus say...



Inge 



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of N Burtt

Sent: den 11 juni 2007 12:19

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: [TN] Nickel content in solder



To all the metallurgy-minded readers.



The old standard for Sn60Pb40 and similar solder baths (J-STD-001?) gave

max Nickel as 0.01%, but I have failed to find any definitive evidence

of the negative effect on solder joints that leads to this figure. An

older reference said that upto 0.1% was OK and gave various possible

problems it might cause but claimed most of these were based on disputed

evidence.



Apparently for SAC305 and similar SAC alloys, J-STD-006 also specs the

same 0.01% max level of Nickel, but again I don't know what detrimental

effect this would have, given one popular SnCu alternate alloy actually

includes about 0.05% Nickel as a deliberate and beneficial additive.



Its apparent that the high tin content lead-free alloys are quite good

at pulling some nickel content out of stainless steel, even when

components in contact with the moving molten metal are treated to

increase resistance to erosion.



Can anyone enlighten me further?



Thanks



Nigel



---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To

unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or

(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET

Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the

posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the

archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please

visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for

additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or

847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------



-----------------------------------------

This message (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose.  If you
are not the intended recipient, delete this message.  If you are
not the intended recipient, disclosing, copying, distributing, or
taking any action based on this message is strictly prohibited.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2