TECHNET Archives

June 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Eric CHRISTISON <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Eric CHRISTISON <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:14:32 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (124 lines)
My previous employers used to charge extra if a customer wanted a 
product without a logo. After all, it then becomes a special....

But yes, agree with the comments on indulging the customer in order to 
keep their business.

Regards,





Hogg, Blair K. wrote:
> Joe,
>
> We all know what opinions are like, and everybody's got one. So here's
> mine:
>
> If your customer did not explicitly state somewhere that no additional
> markings are allowed, maybe somewhere buried in T's&C's or in a
> referenced specification on their drawing, they don't have a right to
> ask for free replacements. However, the question you need to ask
> yourself is how important is this customer to your business? Are you
> willing to let them go elsewhere for the boards? 
>
> You probably have an ethical, legal and moral right to ask them to
> change their spec and place a new order. You will need to be prepared in
> the event that they don't order from your company, and for the
> possibility that they have a legal team hanging around drinking coffee
> and eating donuts waiting for something to do, and can make your life
> miserable.
>
> So there you have it- my opinion, take it for what its worth, and have a
> happy Friday.
>
> Blair Hogg
> GAI-Tronics Corp.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Joe Hughes
> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 9:37 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [TN] Vendor Markings
>
> I'm interested in opinions regarding Vendor Markings.  If a fabrication
> drawing is silent regarding vendor markings, is it acceptable to apply
> the fabricators UL logo?  We have a customer that is angry we applied
> our logo.
> However, we feel we need to apply our logo for our own traceability and
> ability to do failure analysis should the boards ever be in question.  
>
> We have had several occasions where our customers return boards we
> didn't build.  It obviously is easy when we can show them the logo is
> not ours, but it gets difficult when there are no logos on the board.
>
> They'd like us to rebuild 5 lots of boards due to not asking them if it
> was acceptable to apply our vendor id.  
>
> Should the fabricator be responsible for requesting approval for vendor
> markings on every job, or should the board buyer be responsible for
> stating no vendor markings allowed?
>
> Your input is appreciated.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
> unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
> (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
> Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
> posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
> archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
> visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
> additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> *******************************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> the system manager.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
> for the presence of computer viruses.
>
> www.Hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>   

-- 
Eric Christison Msc
Mechanical Engineer
Home Personal, Communication Sector
Imaging Division

STMicroelectronics (R&D) Ltd
33 Pinkhill
Edinburgh EH12 7BF
United Kingdom

Tel:	+44 (0)131 336 6165
Fax:	+ 44 (0)131 336 6001

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2