TECHNET Archives

June 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Anslow, Phillip" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Anslow, Phillip
Date:
Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:56:59 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (78 lines)
Personally, I'd rather see them for traceability. IPC-A-600 section 2.8
puts the emphasis on the procurement documentation, so if it wasn't
explicit and they're on, it comes down to relationship and whether this
has degraded performance, solderablity etc (which I doubt).
Arrange meeting with customer to set up a customer profile which
captures this as "general rules" - even then some things fall through
the net - and it being pragmatic again. List things which can be done -
the obvious compensations, the things that should be notified - clipping
silkscreen, and the must refers - feature changes, as well as the
allowable inclusions - logo, balance, test coupons and get agreement.
I guess it also depends upon application, security, commercial
sensitivity etc and this can be a minefield.
Keep talking and build the relationship - my 50p.
Regards,
Phil. 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Joe Hughes
Sent: 22 June 2007 14:37
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Vendor Markings

               *** WARNING ***

This mail has originated outside your organization, either from an
external partner or the Global Internet. 
     Keep this in mind if you answer this message. 

I'm interested in opinions regarding Vendor Markings.  If a fabrication
drawing is silent regarding vendor markings, is it acceptable to apply
the fabricators UL logo?  We have a customer that is angry we applied
our logo.
However, we feel we need to apply our logo for our own traceability and
ability to do failure analysis should the boards ever be in question.  

We have had several occasions where our customers return boards we
didn't build.  It obviously is easy when we can show them the logo is
not ours, but it gets difficult when there are no logos on the board.

They'd like us to rebuild 5 lots of boards due to not asking them if it
was acceptable to apply our vendor id.  

Should the fabricator be responsible for requesting approval for vendor
markings on every job, or should the board buyer be responsible for
stating no vendor markings allowed?

Your input is appreciated.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------


********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or distribute its contents to any other person. 

MBDA UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales, registration number 3144919 whose registered office is at Six Hills Way, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2DA, England.
********************************************************************

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2