EMBEDDEDNET Archives

June 2007

EmbeddedNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
D-50 Embedded Devices Committee Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:37:34 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
(if you bristle a little at the comments about "unsuccessful track record 
from the old embedded technology", I understand (Denny)
***********************************
EPTE Newsletter from DKN Research, 
#722, June 10, 2007
(www.dknresearch.com)
Topics of the Week
JPCA Show 2007 (Part II) 
The most popular topic explored at the exhibition was embedded components 
in printed circuits. A special seminar was held to discuss this new 
technology; many companies speculated about the technologies; and a 
significant number of exhibition booths featured some proposals with the 
embedded passive technologies. This could be a revival for the embedded 
passive technology that was prominent in the U.S. several years ago.
Industry experts recalled the unsuccessful track record from the old 
embedded technology; therefore, new thought processes and ideas were 
forthcoming from many companies.  One big difference is the embedding of 
the actual chips into electronic components.  Multilayer board 
manufacturers are embedding not only passive components, but also active 
chips; in particular small size ICs. The small size chip components are 
mounted on the pads of inner layers instead of the outer layers of 
multi-layer boards.  Surprisingly, several multi-layer board manufacturers 
and flexible circuits? manufacturers exhibited a similar concept for 
embedding technology with low profile CSP (Chip Scale Package) produced by 
a WLP (Wafer Level Package) process. 
An engineer from a board manufacturer explained to me this approach, which 
could evolve into a standard for the electronics industry in Japan.  More 
than two dozen companies, mostly multi-layer board manufacturers, flexible 
circuit manufacturers and chip device suppliers have formed an R&D 
consortium called EWLP (Embedded Wafer Level Package).  Their main goal is 
to develop new concepts for the embedding technology.  Semiconductor and 
circuit board manufacturers who are members of the consortium have teamed 
up.   Semiconductor manufacturers are provided special small and thin WLP 
chips. Accordingly, the circuit board manufacturers are developing similar 
embedding technology for the WLP devices based on the same specifications.
Difficulties could arise from the embedding of the small size passive 
components as well as the embedding of WLP because of smaller sized chips. 
 Nowadays, 0603 sized components are very common for cellular phone boards 
in Japan.  Since companies are developing 0402 and 0201 size components 
for the next generation packaging, chips thinner than 0.2 mm are already 
available. It is thinner than one hundredth of inch and comparable to one 
conductor layer of a multilayer board. 
Several board manufacturers are trying to employ the traditional 
technology approach with the embedded passive components that include the 
screen-printing process with special paste materials or lamination & 
etching process for special laminates form register and dielectric 
materials.  But most manufacturers are considering a combination with the 
other technologies. They explain that the traditional embedded passive 
technologies are not competitive for both  circuits density or 
manufacturing cost compared to the standard SMT technologies with small 
chip components or new embedded chip component technology. 
By the way, I asked many companies to comment about the volume production 
and plans to use the new technology in actual applications. Unfortunately, 
no one would prognosticate or provided me with a clear direction for the 
actual applications. They all agreed the new embedded technology remains 
at the R&D stage, and it needs more time before the next step - actual 
volume application.
I hope the new embedded technology does not suffer the same fate as its 
predecessor.  Good luck!
Dominique Numakura, DKN Research ([log in to unmask])

ATOM RSS1 RSS2