TECHNET Archives

April 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:26:41 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (137 lines)
Brian,

The day you agree blindly on what I say, I will get worried, Brian.
Theoretically, you are so right, sir. But I dare use the conclusions of
daily work and practical experience. We accept single bubbles, air
entrapments or outgassing entrapments, according to what I said, but if
the bubbles increase in size, and become real atmospheric or gas bridges
between hot lines or between package leads, then we pull the emergency
brake and call people to MBR or similar. Our failure report system, as
well as incoming inspection and other tools, have not indicted one
single failure caused by \single\ bubbles in the coatings the last 20
years. At the same time, I take the occasion to mention about
globtopping or passivation or coating semi chips. Here, bubbles can be
catastrophic. But that belongs more or less to IMAP members and like, I
think. Naked semi chips on PWBs still not a hit, which I regret. COB
would make daily life little more interesting....
Thanks for your correct adds.

By the way, can you still find useful Cu on your isle


Inge 

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Ellis [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: den 24 april 2007 13:06
To: TechNet E-Mail Forum; Hernefjord Ingemar
Subject: Re: [TN] Conformal Coating Voids

I would disagree with your blind acceptation of isolated bubbles, Inge. 
I would insist on knowing the cause of the bubbles before accepting
them, and their location. It would not be oxygen that would worry me;
have you thought about water vapour that could condense? Even if there
is only one now, will there be more in a few months?

Now, let's look at modern high-speed/frequency electronics. An airfilled
microbubble between a transmission line pair will have little effect
because substituting a dielectric constant of 1 for, say, 3 over such a
tiny distance will hardly cause a visible blip on your TD reflectometer.

But are you sure that a dielectric constant of 72, instead of 3, would
have so little effect? Not to mention the capacitive effect from
neighbouring tracks causing crosstalk?

And one little thought for you to ponder: all vesication probably starts
with a single microbubble.

Sorry to upset your complacency.

Brian

Hernefjord Ingemar wrote:
> If you get bubbles that 'look like foam', there is something wrong in 
> the process. We use Humiseal acrylic coatings, and have tried Urethane

> before. Single microscopic bubbles are acceptable, which means in the 
> range 1 mil or less. We use to say, that the bubbles must not exceed 
> one third of the total thickness of the coating.
> 
> A bubble is entrapped atmosphere, and the oxygen content can 
> theoretically cause oxidation. The oxygen content in such little a 
> bubble is not enough to cause any oxidation. When you use the word 
> corrosion, one use to think of chemical reactions serious enough to 
> damage the whole solder joint, or make the lead fall off the package. 
> I would like to see the microscopic bubble that could cause such
damage!
> Would be no less than a miracle! Single air bubbles is nothing to be 
> worried about, foam of bubbles is something you need overlook.
> 
> Inge
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Joel Alexander
> Sent: den 23 april 2007 21:47
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [TN] Conformal Coating Voids
> 
> We are using Urethane coating on an assembly that uses  63/37 solder. 
> We are using organic water soluble flux. We are Ionic testing after 
> wash and we are well within IPC cleanliness specifications. We 
> installed a selective coating machine and in our initial run of 
> product we had some small bubbles that look like foam. Our customer 
> does not like it but our stand is that it meets IPC-A-610 and 
> J-STD-001 requirements since there in no obvious voids between 
> conductors. They were worried about corrosion if a bubble was against 
> a lead. The bubbles are fully encapsulated. Does anyone think this is
a valid concern?
> 
> 
> 
> Joel Alexander
> Quality Assurance Manager
> TT APSCO, INC. 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To 
> unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt 
> or
> (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET 
> Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
> posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the 
> archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please

> visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 
> for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at 
> [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To 
> unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt 
> or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET

> Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the 
> posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the 
> archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please

> visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 
> for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at 
> [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
> 

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2