TECHNET Archives

April 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joel Alexander <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:46:50 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
We are using Urethane coating on an assembly that uses  63/37 solder. We 
are using organic water soluble flux. We are Ionic testing after wash and 
we are well within IPC cleanliness specifications. We installed a 
selective coating machine and in our initial run of product we had some 
small bubbles that look like foam. Our customer does not like it but our 
stand is that it meets IPC-A-610 and J-STD-001 requirements since there in 
no obvious voids between conductors. They were worried about corrosion if 
a bubble was against a lead. The bubbles are fully encapsulated. Does 
anyone think this is a valid concern? 



Joel Alexander
Quality Assurance Manager
TT APSCO, INC. 

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2