TECHNET Archives

April 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Marsico, James" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Marsico, James
Date:
Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:27:41 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (108 lines)
I've been looking at ASTM F22-02, Standard test method for Hydrophobic
Surface Films by Water-Break Test.  The procedure is stated as follows:
"Withdraw the test surface, in a vertical position, from the container
overflowing with water."

The interpretation of results states:
"Surfaces tested ... shall be considered free of hydrophobic
contaminants by this test method if the draining water layer remains as
a thin continuous film over the surface for 1 min after withdrawal of
the surface from the overflow container.  If hydrophobic contaminants
are present, as evidenced by a formation of a discontinuous water film
within 1 min after withdrawal of the surface from the overflow
container, the length of time necessary for the water-break to occur is
a rough indication of the degree of contamination". 

Now, a couple of questions.  How can you expect all surfaces, assuming
that they are contamination free, to remain wet and draining for 1
minute after removal from a tank?  Should this be 1 minute of continuous
rinse?  What if all of the water drains off before the minute is up, is
that a failure?  In my case, when removed from the water bath, the water
remains a continuous film for 15 seconds, after that, no more water
remains.

Comments?

Jim Marsico
EDO Corporation
1250 New Horizons Blvd.
North Amityville, NY 11701
631-630-5079
[log in to unmask]
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Ellis [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 2:40 AM
To: TechNet E-Mail Forum; Marsico, James
Subject: Re: [TN] Water-break Test

Before even trying to rely on the water break test, I suggest you may 
care to read the peer-reviewed paper I presented in Circuit World, 
Volume 35, Number 4, 2005. pp 47-50, entitled "The Water Break Test". 
This will explain that there are a number of fallacies involved, when 
relying on such empirical methods. The main one is that the test will 
succeed only on contaminated surfaces.

Brian

Marsico, James wrote:
> Hello Technet:
> 
>  
> 
> We have an application where we have to etch a PTFE PWB in preparation
> for bonding.   The etch is a commercially available sodium-containing
> solution.  We're also expected to meet a water-break test prior to
> bonding.  We're having trouble meeting the water-break test and was
> wondering if the two (etched PWB and water-break) are compatible.  If
> so, what cleaning/rinsing could be performed after the etching to
ensure
> a water-break free surface?
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
>  
> 
> Jim Marsico
> 
> EDO Corporation
> 
> Amityville:  631-630-5079
> 
> Bohemia:  631-218-7057
> 
> [log in to unmask]
> 
>  
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
> 

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2