Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | (Combined Forum of D-33a and 7-31a Subcommittees) |
Date: | Mon, 2 Apr 2007 09:10:07 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Tom,
> I spent a good deal of time Friday trying to find out. So far, they're
> telling me that the study was funded by the government and can't be
> released.
> Freedom-of-Information Act?
> I'll keep digging since I thought the industry in general had
> come to the same conclusion that in today's world of better processes and
> materials, along with process control, etchback is a liability more than an
> asset. Many high reliability customers have reduced the maximum etchback
> allowed on their product for that reason,
> Agreed
> but have not yet allowed desmear
> because they don't want to invest time to qualify a supplier's desmear
> process.
> I do not understand what that mens, how can you not have/allow desmear?
> Isn't it the same process only by a different name?
>
>
Werner
**************************************
See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
|
|
|