TECHNET Archives

March 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"P. Langeveld" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, P. Langeveld
Date:
Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:39:16 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (218 lines)
Dear Collegues,

The gold content in tin-rich solders should be restricted till 3 w/w%
with penalty of increased chance of brittle solder joints. Over 5 w/w%
of Au, the chance of knocked off components, as Sani described, after
1 week in stock is more than 25% (personal experience). So you have to
calculate how much solder paste you need on your NiAu metallisations.

Soft Soldering Processes
Peer Langeveld, Consultant



2007/3/26, Paymon Sani <[log in to unmask]>:
> Hello Christopher,
>
> IPC-4552, Specification for ENIG process does not specify a value for
> your question below. IPC suggests a minimum of 2 uin at four sigma below
> the mean; the typical value is 3 to 5 uin to provide good solderability
> to the Nickel layer within 1 year after the PCB fabrication.
>
> In the past, we experienced brittle solder joints with gold that was 12
> uin thick. The parts fell off the assembly when it was knocked against a
> rigid surface such as the top surface of a table.
>
> If you can not find a good answer to your question then you may decide
> to create a DOE to model the relationship between the gold thickness and
> the hardness of the solderjoint. This would be a good project for an
> undergraduate engineering student!
>
> Hope this helps,
> Paymon Sani
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Christopher Nash
> Sent: March 26, 2007 11:42 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [TN] Gold %
>
> Hello all, what is the IPC standard for the acceptable level/percentage
> of
> gold that can be consumed into a solder joint before gold embrittlement
> becomes an issue?
>
> Christopher J. Nash
> Mid-West Technical Support Engineer
> Indium Corporation of America
> Phone #: (315) 853-4900 x7521
> Fax #: (315) 853-1000
> www.indium.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stadem, Richard D.
> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 11:33 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] Press-fit Soldering
>
> Jumper mods can be made to standard compliant press-fit pins. However,
> unlike conventional pin-through connectors, you may not be able to
> rework (to remove) the connector should you ever need to. This is
> because standard solder removal methods such as wicking or solder
> suckers will not be able to remove every bit of solder where the
> compliant pin makes contact with the hole wall.
> Do not think that if you apply solder sparingly, you will not fill the
> hole and thus will not solder the compliant pin to the hole wall. If
> either the connector pin or the hole has any tin or tin/lead finish,
> simply touching a solder iron to the pin will be enough to solder the
> pin to the hole wall by reflowing the plating finish.
> But if you have to add the jumper, make sure the assembly has passed all
> electrical testing first. I am assuming you wish to put the jumpers on
> the solder side of the assembly.
> If, however, you wish to solder to the top side, then wrap and solder
> around the pin up away from the pad (if possible), and perform soldering
> only to meet the wrap-and-solder criteria, where the wrap must be a
> minimum of 3/4ths of the way around the pin, the soldering must be such
> that the lead contour is visible, and the insulation of the jumper
> begins a maximum of one wire diameter from the solder joint. A heatsink
> clip should be positioned where the pin enters the pwb to prevent the
> plating from getting hot enough to reflow, if needed.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bob Barr
> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 11:07 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [TN] Press-fit Soldering
>
> Hi All,
>
> Engineering wants to solder a few jumper wires to press-fit pins on
> production boards. I am not completely comfortable soldering to
> press-fit pins and want to get input from others because there appears
> to be conflicting information between previous posts on this subject and
> IPC-610.
>
> I have read concern that the heat from soldering (hand soldering in this
> case) may compromise the press-fit connection - the theory being that
> the hole is already physically deformed and under some degree of stress
> by design of the press-fit pin and that heat may produce additional
> unintended stress. Since we are soldering a jumper wire the entire hole
> will not be filled and there will be a limited amount of heat
> introduced. Having never seen rework wires soldered to press-fit pins on
> production boards, I don't know if this is really a risk. Has anybody
> done this? The connector vendor is not willing to comment because they
> don't have information about this, so that adds to the unknown.
>
> The second issue I have read about is that the design of the press-fit
> connection prohibits the formation of a properly wetted solder interface
> between the pin and plated through hole. Since we are talking about a
> solder connection to connect a jumper wire to end of the pin and not for
> an electrical connection of the pin to the board I don't think this
> applies to our case.
>
> On the other hand, IPC-610 does have a section (4.3.2.1) that gives
> criteria for soldering press-fit pins so they must think it is OK. It
> states that press-fit pins are not intended to be soldered, but if
> soldering is required it gives criteria.
>
> So, my quandry is...is soldering jumper wires to press-fit pins a risk
> or not?
>
> Thanks in advance for any and all help.
>
> Bob
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
> unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
> (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
> Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
> posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
> archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
> visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
> additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
> in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at:
> http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site
> http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
> for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
> or
> 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ***This email, its content and any files transmitted with it are
> intended solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged
> and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please delete
> and contact the sender by return and delete the material from any
> computer. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
> taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
> entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
>
> Messages sent via this medium may be subject to delays, non-delivery and
> unauthorized alteration. This email has been prepared using information
> believed by the author to be reliable and accurate, but Indium
> Corporation makes no warranty as to accuracy or completeness. In
> particular, Indium Corporation does not accept responsibility for
> changes made to this email after it was sent. Any opinions or
> recommendations expressed herein are solely those of the author. They
> may be subject to change without notice.***
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
> in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at:
> http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site
> http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
> ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Confidentiality Notice
>
> This e-mail and any attachment(s) are intended for the individual or entity to which this email is addressed and may contain information that is confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, please be aware that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone at 604.430.4336 or by return e-mail, and please delete or destroy all copies of this communication.  Thank you!
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2