TECHNET Archives

March 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 23 Mar 2007 11:21:26 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (96 lines)
Dave

Like most indirect measurements, I doubt that anyone can tell you what is 
required for your process. I suggest that you test a few boards that meet a 
criteria with which you are comfortable. If they assemble without 
delaminating then I would set this is the requirement for future product.

Best regards

Lee


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave Seymour" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 10:19 AM
Subject: [TN] T260 tests


> Good Morning,
>
> This is my first time having a test house run the IPC T260 test 2.4.24.1.
>
> The Time to delamination test determines how long before the board
> starts to delaminate.
>
> The Question:
>
> What "Time to delamination" is good enough for lead free assembly?
>
> The results for the tests we had run on a 14 layer, FR408 samples were
> in 25-27 minutes
> range on a number of samples.
>
> It would seem to me, that this test is only a relative comparison
> between different materials.
> For example if material  "A" was 12 minutes and material " B" was 20
> minutes, one could
> assume that "B" was a better material than "A". But, one could not
> determine the if the material
> could survive all the temp cycles required by assembly.
>
> Is this a correct assumption?
>
> I'm willing to share pictures and charts, if anyone is interested.
>
> Thanks.
> Dave
>
> -- 
> Dave Seymour, CID+
> Catapult Communications Inc.
> 800 Perimeter Park Dr, Suite A
> Morrisville, NC 27560
>
> Direct: (919)653-4249
> Main: (919)653-4180
> Fax: (919)653-4297
>
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *********************************************************************************************************
> "This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and privileged 
> information of Catapult Communications"
> *********************************************************************************************************
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 
> for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 
> 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
> 

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2