TECHNET Archives

March 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 1 Mar 2007 22:05:56 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (71 lines)
The pad size is the easy one!

If it's a dense 0.5mm pitch, that's equivalent to 19.7 mils.  If you
need to route between pads, then you will need to use 3x3 mil
linexspace.  That leaves 10.7mils for the pad.  This is about 0.26mm,
and going less than that can be pretty problematic:  It's hard to get
solder paste to print a dot even that small.

What that doesn't tell you is:
-For many etching technologies, the smaller the radius of curvature
(smaller round pad), the more over-etched they end up.  So your 10.7 mil
pad will probably over-etch unless the pcb fab makes a special effort to
add extra "swell" to them.  I have tried some flip chips with 8mil
(0.2mm) pads and seen them so over-etched they were useless.
-You need to figure out how to get a useable solder mask put on the
board.  If you don't have routes between the pads, then this isn't a big
problem, but if you do, then you will need to work very carefully with
the pcb fab and you need to be prepared to reject the boards based on
poor mask alignment.  You can also enter the great debate on whether to
use mask defined pads!

Wayne Thayer

>>> [log in to unmask]  >>>
Hi

I am working on a new board with a 0.5mm pitch BGA and I am wonder if
someone can advise me on the footprint.

1) the datasheet says the solder ball is 0.3mm +/-0.05mm
2) IPC recommends to use 80% of ball diameter for the pad which would be
0.24mm
3) Would it be OK to use a 0.2mm pad? I am hesitant to go against
recommended 
size without some corroborating documentation. The reason I would want
to
use 0.2mm pad is to avoid using via-in-pad.

I am curious if IPC defines footprints based on what is good for
manufacturing or is it simply theoretical?

Thanks
Bob 

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2