TECHNET Archives

March 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Wenger, George M." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Wenger, George M.
Date:
Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:14:56 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (174 lines)
On this one I'll have to disagree and side with Rudy.  
Richard,



On this one I'll have to disagree and side with Rudy.  I'm not a

metallurgist but it is my understanding that solid state diffusion of

copper through nickel is extremely slow.  Even if it did migrate to the

surface of the nickel what problem would it cause?  Certainly not a

solderability problem.  It is my understanding that most fluxes were

formulated to reduce copper oxide not nickel oxide.  The flux chemistry

should certainly work better on the copper oxide on the surface than if

there was nickel oxide.  From my old hybrid integrated circuit days I

was lead to believe that the people doing wire bonding wanted thick

nickel and thick gold.  Their reasoning was that the nickel is a

leveling agent and provided a "hard"  surface as will as prevented a

diffusion barrier.  There is certainly lots of published work indicating

that thick nick was advantageous for wire bonding but I have not seen

any that has shown you need thick nickel to get good soldering.  There

is certainly lots of published work indicating that you need a good

quality gold coating to protect the underlying nickel from oxidizing.





Regards,

George

George M. Wenger

Andrew Corporation Wireless Network Solutions

Senior Principal FMA / Reliability Engineer

40 Technology Drive, Warren, NJ 07059

(908) 546-4531 [Office]  (732) 309-8964 [Cell]



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stadem, Richard D.

Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 4:40 PM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] Solderability problems on through holes only.



The nickel barrier may be too thin, allowing copper to migrate through.

This would lead to poor solderability. 



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of R Sedlak

Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 3:29 PM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] Solderability problems on through holes only.



I would suspect quality of gold plate.   If the gold plate was light,

and therefore porous, the Nickel under the gold might oxidize during the

SMT, and become unsolderable?



Rudy Sedlak

RD Chemical Company





Peter Wong <[log in to unmask]> wrote: Hi Technetters,



 



We are having a solderability problem confined to only through hole

locations where we need some help or advice.  



 



We are soldering a no-clean SAC305 alloy to an ENIG finished board.  All

SMT solder joints (both sides) are fine.  During hand soldering in our

dedicated lead free area, we are having problems with solder wetting to

some of the annular rings and barrels of through hole locations, not all

holes.  The assembly is an 0.062" thick 4 layer 1"x1" board so it is not

thermally challenging.



 



We've built thousands of these in the past without this particular

problem.



 



The time lag between smt and through hole assembly is 1-2 days.



 



We've tried using a more aggressive flux such as OA flux with no

improvement.



The only way that we can get solder to wet is to mechanically scrape the

annular rings with a pick.  



 



Has anyone seen this before?  Why would this only occur on some of the

through hole locations and not on smt pads?



 



We have isolated this to a specific lot code of boards and are waiting

for some advice from our board vendor as well.



 



Thanks



Peter



 





---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To

unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or

(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET

Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the

posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the

archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please

visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for

additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or

847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------





 

---------------------------------

No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go with Yahoo! Mail for

Mobile. Get started.



---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To

unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or

(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET

Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the

posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the

archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please

visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for

additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or

847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text

in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet

To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)

To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at:

http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site

http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional

information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100

ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------





------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This message is for the designated recipient only and may

contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  

If you have received it in error, please notify the sender

immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of

this email is prohibited.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[mf2]



---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2