TECHNET Archives

March 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Kasprzak <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Bill Kasprzak <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:13:45 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (122 lines)
Jim,

As a bare circuit board this condition, obviously the board is 
unacceptable.

In looking at the pictures, it is evident that you have components and 
labor invested into this assembly. The picture does not do justice to what 
the rest of the assembly looks like, where it is used, customer 
expectations, quality requirements, etc etc.

So then the answer becomes, it depends. 

There are a million scenarios where a case could be made to use the board. 
There would also be an equal number of scenarios where you should not use 
the board.

The bottom line is to tell your board mfr about this condition, get an 
explanation how this board left their facility, decide if you need to 
increase your incoming inspection and just move on 

 




"West, Jim" <[log in to unmask]> 
Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
03/20/2007 10:06 AM
Please respond to
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to
"West, Jim" <[log in to unmask]>


To
[log in to unmask]
cc

Subject
[TN] Pad damage






Hi everyone,
 
Take a look at the link
http://stevezeva.homestead.com/files/Pad_Damaged.jpg
<http://stevezeva.homestead.com/files/Pad_Damaged.jpg> 
 
Tell me what you think about the pad damage shown.  I have not come
across anything like this before, and was asked by our group leader if
this was acceptable.  My initial thought was this is not acceptable and
we should reject the board.  As always, I wanted to point out the IPC
section that would explain why this is not good.  However, I could not
come across anything except for section 10.2.9 (Laminate
conditions-conductors/lands).  I know there is probably a section I am
overlooking? 
 
There is still a high percentage of the pad intact and no evidence of
lifting.  Is this something common that others have seen?  If so, what
do I tell the board house to look out for to prevent something like this
in the future? 
 
Would anyone accept this?
 
 
 
Thanks, 
 
 
 
 
<http://stevezeva.homestead.com/files/Pad_Damaged.jpg>
 


Jim West
Engineering Manager
Nexergy Inc.
www.nexergy.com
tel: (614) 351-6216
fax: (614) 324-1979



This email message and all attachments transmitted with it are intended 
solely for the use of the addressee(s) and may contain legally privileged, 
protected or confidential information. If you believe that you have 
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by 
email reply and please delete this message from your computer and destroy 
any copies.

--------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2