TECHNET Archives

March 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Matt Kehoe <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Matt Kehoe <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 9 Mar 2007 11:00:46 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
We have been processing a family of boards for 3 years. No issues. New PCB
Vendor and the boards suddenly will not print very well. Sloppy printing
definition. Heavy heavy deposition.

Closer inspection reveals that the soldermask is built up .0012-.0019 over
the vias, preventing the stencil from gasketing. Vendor claims they are
built to print.. Opinions? 

Pictures at ;
http://www.sipad.com/ssiqa/3942vias.pdf
http://www.sipad.com/ViasBuildup.pdf

The question we are trying to answer is, if your boards came in with mask
this thick over the vias would you feel confident in running them without
modifing the stencil? Would you expect a significant increase in solder volume?


mk

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2