Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:40:17 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Amol,
is it impossible to have the Ni protected through tinning or with another oxide proofing element, such as Au? Why would the part manufacturer would ship unprotected Ni?
Regards,
Ioan
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Kane, Amol (349)
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 11:36 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Soldering to Beryillum Copper
Thank for your reply Michael. Correct, I am soldering to the Ni. Unfortunately cannot use the stronger OA flux, hence the issue. I will try to find out the type of nickel on the surface, but would that really help me out with determining the fix?....probably not.......will try the mechanical cleaning approach on a few to see how they pan out.
Thanks,
Amol
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|