TECHNET Archives

February 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 16 Feb 2007 08:50:06 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (100 lines)
To add to the discussion I'd like to reference a quote from Dewey on the
TechNet about AR coatings back in March 2004;

"Why wear a latex suit, when a dust bag will do just fine"...

That about says it all, don't ya' think? B^D)

-Steve Gregory- 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Whittaker, Dewey
(EHCOE)
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 8:19 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Using Type AR Conformal Coating

It is relatively easy to adequately conformal coat assemblies with type
AR for Military applications. I've even heard Doug can do it. Having
said that I want you to know that I consider type AR a glorified dust
bag, but if that's all you need and not a Gucci as Phil wants with his
Bunny suit, then fine.
I have always believed that one should not rely on any additional
electrical benefits derived from the application of a conformal coat to
achieve the functional intent of the design. It should only be used to
negate the need to derate operational parameters when used in harsh
environments. 
Assessing your needs and understanding your liabilities will make the
material choice a lot easier. Process techniques and application
guidelines are available for all the materials.
Dewey   

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of - Bogert
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 5:24 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Using Type AR Conformal Coating

February 15, 2007

Folks, we have some military OEM'S that are switching from Type UR
conformal coating to Type AR.  The main reason for the switch is because
it is hard to remove Type UR coating in event of a rework, and certain
chemicals sold by the coating manufacturers for UR coating removal are
highly conductive and have caused problems since the cleaning process
did not adequately remove them.  The other reason is we wanted a coating
that could be easily removed in event product failed in the field so we
could do ATE to quickly find the source of the problem.  Our product is
used in a military application but it is contained in a cabinet that is
dust tight.  We have some assemblies that are not coated at all with no
known problems.

Do any of you folks use Type AR for military product, and if so, what
are your experiences using the coating?  I have heard about problems
using alcohol for coating removal since it goes where you do not want it
to go.  I have also heard that if a spray process is used, it takes 4 or
more passes on each side of the board to achieve the minimum J-STD-001
thickness.  At least one source indicated using AR may cause some solder
joint reliability issues.

Any info you have would be a help.  Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing
per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2