TECHNET Archives

February 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:28:33 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Hi Graham,
You are absolutely right, with the LF-solders, vapor phase soldering is the 
way to go, because of 
(1) assured uniform temperatures, everywhere, and 
(2) soldering just above Liquidus is possible avoiding the much higher peak 
reflow temperatures needed because of the thermal gradients resulting from all 
other heat transfer modes.

Unfortunately, this technically very elegant way of reflowing solder got a 
black eye in its earlt history, because oven manufacturers designed their oven 
improperly in terms in insufficient pre-heating capability [resulting in solder 
pooling up component leads] and insufficient sealing [resulting in expensive 
vapor fluid losses].



Werner

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2