TECHNET Archives

February 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:46:05 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (250 lines)
Want a quartpound burger with french fries, no bread,  Heinz ketchup,
french mustard, tartar sauce, boston mixture and a Czech beer.

Inge 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Graham Naisbitt
Sent: den 13 februari 2007 15:39
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] FW: Report from a BGA

Troubled Techies

If I might make an observation - I think you could avoid most of these
issues with Vapour Phase soldering.

Simple physics - a heated vapour at 225C will condense onto ALL surfaces
including under components and Hey Presto - uniform soldering. We have
many companies over here doing that even to the extent of doing away
with x-ray analysis.

Unless I am missing something?

Hope it helps

Kindest regards,

Graham Naisbitt

[log in to unmask]



On 12 Feb 2007, at 23:33, John Burke wrote:

> Yes I know the drill - it is a very small one..........8-)
>
> I have carried out that type of profiling many many times.
>
> I have found that the best type of drill to use is actually a dental 
> drill and hand piece. What do other people use out of interest?
>
> John
>
>
>
> John Burke
>
> (408) 515 4992
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Guy Ramsey
> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 1:39 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] FW: Report from a BGA
>
> We operate with the kind of knowledge that Richard and Werner have 
> shared along with the experience of measuring many different kinds of 
> assemblies, materials, with different methods of thermal transfer and 
> tools.
> When we get
> the luxury of following the "correct" way of checking a board we also 
> run thermal couples under parts, taped to the part, and taped to the 
> board to learn how these materials respond to our machines and process

> methods. Then we make educated guesses, based on experience.
>
> You know the drill.
>
>
> Starting March 1, 2007 New Location
> Guy Ramsey
> R&D Assembly
> 1660 East Race Street
> Allentown PA 18109-9580
> (610) 264-1887
> FAX (610) 264-1877
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steve Gregory
> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 4:09 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] FW: Report from a BGA
>
> What about us CEM's that rarely have the luxury of a spare bare board,

> or spare BGA's that we can play with?
>
> Sometimes we can convince our customers that we should have a spare 
> PCB and BGA's to be able to properly set up a reflow profile, but most

> of the time we can't.
>
> What I do in that case, is to try and find a scrap PCB that might be 
> close to the same thermal mass, and then I have some failed BGA's that

> have been pulled off a board from rework, and just lay them over top 
> of my thermocouples, then do my plot.
>
> I know it's not exact, but it's the best I can do sometimes. I just 
> try to ensure that I hit a high enough peak and stay liquidous for a 
> decent amount of time.
>
> -Steve Gregory-
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stadem, Richard D.
> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 2:56 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] FW: Report from a BGA
>
> Werner, thank you for your note. I totally agree.
> I misread Inge's original email. I thought he said putting a 
> thermocouple on top of the SOLDER PAD was misleading. What he actually

> said was putting a thermocouple on top of the component body was 
> misleading. That is true.
> Another note. I totally agree the best way to thermocouple a profile 
> test board is to drill up into the solder joint, insert the TC from 
> the bottom so the weld is inside the solder ball. However, I then 
> backfill the hole with thermally conductive epoxy with a minimum 
> thermal conductivity of
> 14 BTU/in.
> hr. F. This helps reduce the insulative effect of the PWB just below 
> the weld inside the hole. After the thermally conductive epoxy is 
> cured, I then measure the electrical resistance of each of the 
> thermocouple wires to the solderball via. I should get less than 1 
> ohm. If I do, then I know that the weld is making full mechanical 
> contact with the inside of the solderball and/or the pad. When the 
> mole or data recorder runs through the reflow oven, and I see a very 
> solid line on the graph, I know I am measuring the actual temperature 
> of the solderball/pad mechanical junction. If the profile line is not 
> a solid line throughout, but is "noisy" with little spikes in both 
> directions, then I know I am only measuring air temperature under the 
> BGA, and I disregard that particular reading. The attenuating effect 
> of full metal contact is easily seen.
>
> Incidentially, I recently wanted to verify that a small bake oven was 
> getting a particular subassembly up to a certain temperature in a 
> pre-baking operation. When I suspended  thermocouples around the 
> component within the chamber (measuring the air temperature), the 4 
> thermocouples measuring the air temperature consistently measured 6 
> degrees C. less than the 5 thermocouples that I had embedded into the 
> subassembly using the method I just described. This was long after all

> of the TC readings had flatlined.
> The calibration lab questioned as to how an object being warmed by the

> air currents inside the oven could be hotter than the air currents 
> themselves.
> The only explanation I could offer is that the thermal transfer 
> efficiency of air directly to a thermocouple weld is less efficient 
> than a piece of metal heated by the air making direct contact with the

> weld. I proved this by taking the thermocouples measuring the air and 
> switching them with the thermocouples measuring the subassembly. The 
> measurements were exchanged, one for one. Again, the TCs measuring air

> were all exactly 6 or 7 degrees cooler than those embedded in the 
> assembly. I then took one of the TCs measuring air and clamped it to 
> the metal rack in the oven. It went up 6 degrees.
>
> The same phenomena holds true for a thermocouple weld sitting just 
> above a BGA pad, measuring air temperature alone. I notice it always 
> measures a few degrees cooler than a TC with a good mechanical 
> attachment to the solder or the pad, even when the solder is in 
> liquidus.
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 1:30 PM
> To: Stadem, Richard D.; [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] FW: Report from a BGA
>
>
> Hi Richard,
> Ingemar is absolutely correctthe only way you know what the t's are at

> the solder balls is to put thermocouples in them. It is indeed 
> standar5d procedure see IPC-7530, 7.9.5.
> BGA solder balls get heated by conduction through the PCBmany people 
> do not realize thisand BGA component body is in fact a heat sink and a

> shield preventing both convection and radiation heat transfer.
>
> Regards,
> Werner Engelmaier
> ?????
> Engelmaier Associates, L.C.
> Electronic Packaging, Interconnection and Reliability Consulting
> 7 Jasmine Run
> Ormond Beach, FL 32174 USA
> Phone: 386-437-8747, Cell: 386-316-5904 Werner Engelmaier
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To 
> unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt 
> or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing 
> per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/ 
> archives Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?
> Pageid=4.3.16
> for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at 
> [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To 
> unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt 
> or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET

> Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the 
> posts: send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/ 
> archives Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?
> Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at

> [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2