Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 1 Feb 2007 07:31:16 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Peter! The original intent of implementing the Sn62 solder alloy was
exactly as you described - using the 2% silver content of the alloy to
alter the solder joint dissolution characteristics (the idea that the
introduction of Sn62 alloy was a plot by evil metallurgists to takeover the
electronics industry solder processes is just a myth started by Doug
Pauls!). The use of SAC solder alloys families would seem to be a
improvement for reducing the "leaching" effect due to the 1-4% silver
content the alloys possess but also keep in mind that the melting
temperature is going up by approximately 34C. We can't revise the laws of
physics and the temperature impact outweighs the benefits we get from the
increased silver contents. And yes, double sided reflow just adds another
layer of complexity to the issue. Pbfree soldering has a much tighter
process window than SnPb soldering. And your headaches probably don't stop
there - depending on the alternative termination finish choice you might be
trading leaching concerns for tin whisker concerns. Isn't Pbfree soldering
fun!
Dave
Peter Barton
<[log in to unmask]>
Sent by: TechNet To
<[log in to unmask]> [log in to unmask]
cc
02/01/2007 03:05 Subject
AM [TN] Soldering to Pt/Ag
terminations
Please respond to
TechNet E-Mail
Forum
<[log in to unmask]>
; Please respond
to
Peter Barton
<[log in to unmask]>
Many thanks to all who responded to my question on the above subject, a
couple of which confirm my own theories.
It seem that parts with Pt/Ag (and for that matter others with a Silver
content) terminations are susceptible to Silver leaching from the component
metallisation into the bulk solder and that this is exacerbated by higher
process temperatures.
Now I am not a metallurgist so correct me if I am wrong - we used to employ
62Sn/36Pb/2Ag solder on hybrid assemblies to mitigate this type of problem
back in the good old non-RoHS days. The theory being that the 2% Ag in the
solder slowed the dissolution rate. As we are now using a solder with 3.5%
silver should this not improve the situation, or do the higher process
temperatures used just cancel this out?
Dave Hillman has said that using these parts with SAC305 CAN be done with
careful attention to the soldering process profile. We have done our best
to
minimise the TAL and the peak temperature, mindful of getting all the other
components on the assembly reliably soldered also. The problem parts
concerned are on both sides of a double sided assembly and those on the
side
that is reflowed twice are definitely much worse so I guess this confirms
that they are not really suitable.
Bit of a problem really as there is not an alternative part. Oh well - As
a
responsible contractor we will now inform our customer and await their
response.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Barton
Senior Process Engineer
ACW Technology Ltd
Dinas Isaf West
Tonypandy
Mid Glamorgan. CF40 1XX Wales
Tel: 01443 425275 (direct)
Fax: 023 8048 4882
International Tel : +44 1443 425200
International Fax : +44 23 8048 4882
Website/URL: www.acw.co.uk
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|