TECHNET Archives

January 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:57:53 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (157 lines)
Richard,
"no-clean myth"?  Come on Richard, do you work for a solvent company!?
It is NOT a myth - if you know what you are doing.

Companies like Nortel, Lucent, Westinghouse, IBM and RIM have been
successfully using no-clean fluxes and solder pastes successfully since
at least the early 1990's.  And I am not talking about just two year
life portable electronics - some of these companies made/make servers
and telephone switches that are just shy of having to be Class III and
have expected lifetimes in the order of 20 years.

This of course does not preclude the necessity to clean for certain
types of products or for when certain chemicals are used in your
soldering processes.

You'll scare the crap out of the young'uns.  :)

Bev
RIM 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stadem, Richard D.
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 3:43 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Cleaning

There are many articles, some of which I posted here about a month ago,
that showed that many of the no-clean flux residues are very active
(reactive), sometimes even more so than water soluble (ORH0) fluxes.
Just because it says no-clean does not mean it is always safe to leave
on. One thing you should never do, and that is to mix no-clean liquid
fluxes with other no-clean flux-cored wire solder chemistries.
Read the following link:
http://www.aimsolder.com/techarticles/Incompatibilities.pdf#search=%22no
-clean%20Flux%3A%20the%20use%20of%20multiple%20vendors%20can%20produce%2
0a%20reliability%20time%20bomb%22.
 
Here are articles written by Terry Munson. 
http://www.residues.com/pdf/FailureOfACircuit.pdf#search=%22The%20failur
e%20of%20a%20circuit%3A%20reliability%20effects%20of%20process%20residue
s%22.
 
The best solution is to get rid of all residues. This approach is
prescribed by Terry Munson, Jenny Hwang, and Les Hymes.
http://www.speedlinetech.com/docs/1714.pdf#search=%22detecting%20flux%20
residue%22
 
The most authoritive article on this subject is written by Ken Lei. He
fully exposed the no-clean myth for what it really is.
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/viewContentItem.do?contentType=Art
icle&contentId=1455640
http://circuitsassembly.com/cms/content/view/4229/95/

Doug Pauls also has written many excellent articles on no-clean fluxes,
and on cleaning in general. Check 'em out!


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tempea, Ioan
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 11:18 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Cleaning

So Bev,

LF residues really are more reactive? You seem to have done some
measurements.

Thanks,

Ioan

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Bev Christian
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 12:12 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Cleaning


John,
Not if they do their homework and do the proper testing to show that the
tweak in reactivity won't put them on dangerous ground.  That is why
there are tests like copper mirror, halide ion, British corrosion test,
SIR and electrochemical migration.
Bev
RIM

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Burke
Sent: January 9, 2007 12:02 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Cleaning

That's what I was thinking Brian...................8-)

With the change to lead free and the various "wetting" issues a lot of
people are using a more active flux if only to make the joints "look"
more
like 63/37 and as a result are having to use cleaning systems to remove
the flux.

Of course the ones that do not remove the flux will find out eventually
why they should have done!!

John

 
 
John Burke
 
(408) 515 4992

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2