TECHNET Archives

January 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Maxwell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, John Maxwell <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:29:45 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
I agree with Werner and in the short term try reducing the stencil 
apertures to reduce the mass of solder paste. Try to keep the overlap 
(the distance the chip sits over the pad/solder paste) the same as the 
extension (the distance that the pad/solder paste extends beyond the 
nominal chip length dimension) .

John Maxwell


>In a message dated 1/15/07 14:16:12, [log in to unmask] writes:
>  
>
>>A re-layout of the boards is not an option.
>>
>>    
>>
>Why? All you really need to do is reduce the size of the fillets by making 
>the soldering pads smaller.
>
>
>Werner
>
>  
>

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2