DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

January 2007

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Designers Council Forum)
Date:
Thu, 4 Jan 2007 20:36:23 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (60 lines)
Hi Susy,

That was clear enough to understand,
and I DO have your presentation!

thanks for the tips and the reference.

Jack



On 1/4/07, [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Hi Jack....
>
> The ideal choice is to reference the signal to opposite sides of the same
> plane when it must change directions, but that cannot alwyas be done.
> Another option as you said, is to reference two different ground planes
> because the return can move very easily through the vias.
>
> But returning signals on power layers will work too. You should ALWAYS
> have power and ground layers next to each other at least once in your
> stackup for medium to high speed boards. If the power and ground are close
> to each other <.008" then the signal return can couple from one plane to the
> other and back to the source.
>
> As an example, if you consider the source of the energy to be the cap near
> an IC, the energy then flows from the power side of the cap to the power pin
> of the part, then through the part and out the signal pin and out onto a
> signal layer. Let's say that signal layer references the ground plane, and
> that ground plane is part of a plane pair. When the signal has to change
> direction, it moves to the signal layer on the other side of the plane pair
> and the return now references the power plane. The return on the power plane
> can capacitively couple to the ground plane because they are so close to
> each other and then find it's return path back to the source... the ground
> side of the cap. This does not increase the inductive loop because the
> return path does not have to separate from the original signal. Remember,
> returnis happening constantly, not just at the end of the signal.
>
> If the power and gound planes are separated, this will not work and you
> will be relying on capacitors for return as you mentioned. HOWEVER, the
> faster the frequency, the more limited the usage of the capacitors (even
> high frequency ones), and they are virtually useless above 2-300 MHz. So it
> is better to use the inter-plane capacitance of having the two planes
> together.
>
> Hope this is clear enough to understand.... it's hard to describe in text
> what a picture would easily draw.
> Susy
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2