TECHNET Archives

January 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, N Burtt <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Jan 2007 03:27:24 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
I'm being told that these are not widely used in USA, the common types used 
here in the UK (Peters and Electramask) not readily available, and they create 
packaging and shipping problems... thus US PCB suppliers reluctant to supply 
PCBs with peelable masking applied. Is this true?

Now they are by no means a perfect solution to protecting holes on a PCB 
during wavesolder, but am not aware of another way of doing so in a no-clean 
RoHS process if fixturing can't do it. What do US PCB assemblers do if pre-
applied peelable masking is really not viable? Other ideas?

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2