Werner,

 

You are quite correct......a slip up with semantics!

 

Regards,

    Iain.



-----Original Message-----

From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]

Sent: 16 November 2006 14:51

To: Braddock, Iain; [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] BGA anomaly





*** WARNING ***



This mail has originated outside your organization,

either from an external partner or the Global Internet. 

Keep this in mind if you answer this message. 

	

In a message dated 11/16/06 6:19:19, [log in to unmask] writes:





The reflow profile peaked @ 232C with time above liquidus for, 1) SAC - 29 secs 2) SnPb - 74 secs.







Where did you get "time above liquidus"--I think you mean "time above Solidus"—which is an entirely different thing.



Werner







********************************************************************

This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended

recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended

recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.

You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or

distribute its contents to any other person.

********************************************************************