TECHNET Archives

October 2006

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Dehoyos, Ramon" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Dehoyos, Ramon
Date:
Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:21:08 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (118 lines)
        Another term that may better suit is wetting. It requires that
the one metal melts and  wets the other metal. It does not require that
the two metals melt and alloy. Another factor that it is needed to be
considered is the components. What is the maximum temp that they can
withstand?
        Ramon 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David D. Hillman
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 8:10 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Backward Compatibility of Tin Electroplating

Hi Rich! Unless the electroplated tin has some unique surface finish
characteristics, it is not necessary to exceed 232C (the melting point
of
tin) in the reflow process. Some folks don't realize that the majority
of solder connections are the result of molten solder alloys diffusing
into component or pwb surface finishes rather than both surfaces being
molten.
An example I like to use is that if we needed to "melt" a gold surface
finish (which some component fabricators use as their solderable finish)
then we would need to achieve a reflow profile exceeding 1064C which
would be a bit of an issue for the rest of the assembly! Could the
vendor be suggesting that 232C needs to be exceeded for some other
reason than creating the solder joint?

Dave Hillman
Rockwell Collins
[log in to unmask]




             Richard
             Kraszewski
             <[log in to unmask]
To
             COM>                      [log in to unmask]
             Sent by: TechNet
cc
             <[log in to unmask]>
 
Subject
                                       [TN] Backward Compatibility of
Tin
             10/26/2006 12:17          Electroplating
             AM


             Please respond to
              TechNet E-Mail
                   Forum
             <[log in to unmask]>
             ; Please respond
                    to
                  Richard
                Kraszewski
             <[log in to unmask]
                   COM>






Does anyone have any reason to suspect that tin electroplated SM
components being soldered with a 63/37 solder paste require a profile
that must exceed the reflow temperature of tin?

Being told by a component vendor this is the case.  I would totally
discount this but seem to recall reading this more than once on some
other component Tech data sheets. I can't explain why this would be
necessary, but.....

Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Rich K / Kimball


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing
per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2