TECHNET Archives

September 2006

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 5 Sep 2006 16:20:26 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (69 lines)
Hi Ioan!

Digging a little more, I found that there are no qualification test
reports, and the leads are phosphor bronze and it looks like they plate
the tails with pure tin...

I know that there are a lot of components that have phosphor bronze base
material used in the leads, and likewise, many of the solderability
problems I have experienced in the past have been with phosphor bronze
leads.

I dunno, I would be a little leary of that connector...but again it
depends where it's being used. If it's limited life consumer electronics
I'd be less concerned that if it was a class-3 assembly.

I've used SMT headers on some military boards that have been built for
years and never heard of a problem...they were only being used for
jumpers and not having anything plugged into them that really stressed
the solder joints. But in another case where headers were used to
connect to another assembly, the stress on the solder joints was pretty
extreme and the fix for that was to use some VERY high-dollar MasterBond
epoxy to bond the plastic strip of the header to the PCB and help
protect the solder joints.

-Steve Gregory- 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tempea, Ioan
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 3:31 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Connector reliability

Hi Technos,

I would like what you think about the reliability of the joints formed
by this connector http://samtec.com/ftppub/pdf/SFMH_SM.PDF

It looks pretty much like a butt joint to me, no real compliance.

And since we're here, what about SMT headers, with their massive pins,
are they reliable?

Thanks,

Ioan

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2