TECHNET Archives

August 2006

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dave Dixon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Dave Dixon <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:48:04 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (59 lines)
With all due respect....
How is a person supposed to rewrite something that is "essentially
unintelligible"????
Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Franklin D Asbell
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 8:43 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Does anyone else on Technet find this situation beyond c
omprehension?

Rudy,

Jeesh, I'm thinking you made a point to the entire TechNet group, just
not than the one you intended...

Might I suggest, that in future submissions for ballot that you rewrite
key areas you consider verbose or unintelligible into a format you
believe is more effective, and offer that as an attachment to your
ballot. Perhaps that would be more effective than saying NO - because I
just don't like it!!!

Franklin


-----Original Message-----
From: R Sedlak [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 9:35 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Does anyone else on Technet find this situation beyond
comprehension?

    Just in case anyone still has any remaining hopes that the IPC might
actually someday attempt to achieve something worthwhile, or perhaps
attempt to minimize the confusion in our world, I offer this e-mail
message which I received from the IPC in response to my negative vote on
the proposed Immersion Tin standards.

  It is important to realize, to get the full flavor of this message,
that the standard was submitted to me for my review with two options:
1. Accept
as written,  or 2. reject, with reasons given for rejection.   I
rejected,
because the standard was written in a way which was essentially
unintelligible, and I could not even figure out what they were trying to
say.
  I received the following message in return.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2