TECHNET Archives

August 2006

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
- Bogert <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, - Bogert <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:11:46 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
It is not proper since any mil spec that has a QPL associated with it requires that the product be manufactured by a manufacturer who is listed on the QPL listing.  Some folks have advertised that they meet the mil spec but if there is a QPL then one cannot claim they meet the mil spec unless they are listerd on the QPL since the specs themselves require compliance with the QPL listing in order to meet the mil spec.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Wandering Critic<mailto:[log in to unmask]> 
  To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> 
  Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2006 5:34 PM
  Subject: [TN] QPL question


  Company A, who is "not" on the QPL receives an order from a customer for a product to be certified to current revision of MIL-PRF-55110.

    The customer is informed that company A cannot accept the po nor can they fabricate this because they are 'not' on the QPL. The customer does not care, just want board fabricated with the proper documentation.

    On the direction of the owner, Company A (not on QPL) fabricates the product anyway, then they send it to company B who "is" on the QPL to perform and generate the Group A, In-Process, and Microsection activity, the product ships from company B, but is billed by company A.

    Is this legal? proper?

    WC


  ---------------------------------
  Do you Yahoo!?

  ---------------------------------------------------
  Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
  To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> with following text in
  the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
  To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
  To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>: SET Technet Digest
  Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives<http://listserv.ipc.org/archives>
  Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16<http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16> for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
  -----------------------------------------------------
   Next-gen email? Have it all with the  all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2