TECHNET Archives

August 2006

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:36:01 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (117 lines)
I apologize for the quick/confusing response.  The problems in
maintaining an active process is with ENIG and specifically the
deposition (electroless nickel deposition) part of the process. Similar
to copper deposition, the electroless nickel bath is not steady state,
requiring consistent product flow and a high level of maintenance than
the immersion processes.  The silver bath is very easy to maintain and
simple to operate.  Some of the costs associated with EN are the size of
the line - this line requires many chemical stations consuming a good
deal of space.  

ENIG is more than 2X the cost of IS, which is an increasing delta when
the line is not run day to day. 

Jeffrey Bush
Director, Quality Assurance and Technical Support
VERMONT CIRCUITS INCORPORATED 
           76 Technology Drive - POB 1890 
              Brattleboro, Vermont 05302
                Voice - 802.257.4571 ext 21
                    Fax - 802.257.0011
                       <http://www.vtcircuits.com/> 
                           

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Creswick, Steven
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 1:27 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Immersion Au vs Immersion Ag

Jeff,

Just to make sure that I read your reply correctly - should I infer from
your comments that you believe the IAg process 'likes' to have a
round-the- clock, steady-state flow to keep it stable and that the ENIG
process does not?  Or did you mean it the other way around, that the
ENIG likes round-the-clock operation?

Am not all that intimately familiar with either line and did not wish to
"read in" something that was not intended.

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Bush
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 8:23 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Immersion Au vs Immersion Ag

Silver is by far lower cost than ENIG - materials, process and space
needed to maintain a line.  Deposition processes are high maintenance
and need to be run day to day.  Having to keep this line loaded with
panels influences my view of ENIG performance internally and in the
field.  

Jeffrey Bush
Director, Quality Assurance and Technical Support
VERMONT CIRCUITS INCORPORATED 
           76 Technology Drive - POB 1890 
              Brattleboro, Vermont 05302
                Voice - 802.257.4571 ext 21
                    Fax - 802.257.0011
                       <http://www.vtcircuits.com/> 
                           
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Parsons
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 5:59 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Immerison Au vs Immersion Ag

The "price" would depend on the source.  If your favorite fabricator
does
not have an in-house Ag line then ENIG may be cheaper or vice versa.  If
they have both then, yes, Ag is likely cheaper.

John



THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE AND ANY ATTACHMENTS
SENT FROM GENTEX CORPORATION IS GENTEX CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED
ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. If
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please
immediately notify the sender by return e-mail, and delete this e-mail
message and any attachments from your computer.  




---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2