LEADFREE Archives

August 2006

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Tempea, Ioan" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum)
Date:
Wed, 9 Aug 2006 13:29:19 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Hi Netters,

I am wondering if the last months shed more light on how the various alloys perform. I have skimmed the report recommended by Dave Hillman, available at http://www.acqp2.nasa.gov/LFS.htm but cannot see a clear recommendation.

My stock of SAC305 solder bar is almost depleted and I have to make a decision: shall I continue with SAC305, or switch to SN100C or SACX?

Beyond the cosmetics of the joints and the maintainability of the solder pot, what is your feedback on reliability? Since I am running SAC305 paste, if I use a different alloy at wave, shall I expect more trouble than having the same SAC305 in both processes?

Thanks,

Ioan

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2