LEADFREE Archives

July 2006

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Harvey Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:03:53 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (118 lines)
Bev

Export of first world waste to developing countries is a separate issue.
It goes far beyond the issue of lead, and it needs to be controlled.
Global enforcement of OSHA-like standards for emissions from smelters is
also an issue that needs to be dealt with.  Violations of needed
regulations do not justify throwing the electronics industry baby out with
the dirty water.



--- Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Harvey,
> You know I have been against lead free from an environmental point of
> view (and have published papers proving aspects of that), but I must
> come to Ron Lasky's defence.  Decreasing the number of lead-containing
> boards that go into a recycling plant will undoubtedly make things
> better for the workers.  The question is how much and is it worth it?
> For instance, if we are talking about a first world, well run plant like
> the Noranda one in the greater Toronto area (which I have toured twice),
> it makes little difference whether the boards are leaded or lead-free.
> But if we are talking abut a less well run place...  So Ron's assertion
> is not false, he should have just used a few qualifiers.
>
> Bev Christian
> RIM
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leadfree [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Harvey Miller
> Sent: July 17, 2006 10:29 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [LF] "Safe" recycling Printed Circuits to reclaim solder--does
> that really justify Lead-Free?
>
> The latest lead-free rationalization claims that it makes recycling
> "safer".  None other than Dr. Ron Lasky says so.
> One unintended consequence of l-f will demonstrate again how false is
> that
> assertion.
>
> Silver in the mix will finally incentivize commercially viable
> recycling,
> that is true. But the enormous mass of legacy electronics with tin-lead
> solder is all around us. Even today, penetration of lead-free solder is
> probably still less than 50%. Some boards with lead will find their way
> into the same recycling plants as boards with silver.
>
> Boards will be ground up and and the metal content melted out for
> separation of silver,lead, etc.  Companies like Noranda have been doing
> this for many years. But there's an better example, primary silver
> extraction.
>
> How is the tiny component of silver separated from the preponderant lead
> when they come all mixed from the mine?  That the way it's done and with
> today's pollution controls, done safely to personnel and to the
> environment.  Propagators of this latest lead-free lie will have a hard
> time proving otherwise.
>
> The real toll to the environment of their lead-free efforts will be an
> enormous increase in mining of silver and tin to replace lead.  They
> have
> the gall to claim that they are care about safety or the environment.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV
> 1.8d
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
> in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
> To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks
> send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
> Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site
> http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
> ext.2815
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
> information, privileged material (including material protected by the
> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute
> non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than
> the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this
> transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete
> this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or
> reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not
> authorized and may be unlawful.
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee
> Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
> in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
> To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks
> send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
> Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site
> http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
> ext.2815
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2