TECHNET Archives

June 2006

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jenny Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Jenny Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 Jun 2006 10:02:53 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (59 lines)
Thanks for the replies so far. A little clarification on why I am asking
the question. We are designing a small surface mount connector, but we
won't be assembling this component ourselves, so I can't test it with
the machines that will be building it.  What I am looking for is any
guidance on the flat surface area that will be needed to ensure that it
is unlikely to move about on the pick up tip as it is accelerated across
from the pick to place positions. "As large as possible" isn't very
large on this thing.

If I take the largest flat circular area on the part, take off the
tolerance of the part in the tape, then that gives me a maximum pick up
tip inside diameter. From a reasonable estimate of the vacuum level I
can then get the holding force. If I then guess a coefficient of
friction between nozzle and part I can use the weight of the part to see
if,  say, a 3G acceleration is going to be too much for the holding
force. Is this a good approach? 

Jenny

-----Original Message-----
From: Jenny Drake 
Sent: 05 June 2006 15:49
Subject: Vacuum pick up nozzle area for component weight.

Is there a good rule of thumb for determining the minimum vacuum pick up
nozzle size that will work with a component of a given weight? I am
guessing that the problem is reasonably complex as the component mustn't
move on the nozzle under lateral and rotational acceleration as it is
moved from the tray, or tape, to the PCB. The strength of the vacuum,
the friction between the nozzle and component materials and the centre
of gravity of the component will all affect this for a give component
weight and machine acceleration. Is there a simple rule that people use
that gives good results? 

Jen

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2