TECHNET Archives

June 2006

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ivanoe Pedruzzi <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Ivanoe Pedruzzi <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 5 Jun 2006 21:55:33 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
The simplest is to choose a nozzle size as greater as the
body of the component. Can't be more than that because the
machine would start rejecting parts as the camera image
won't correlate to the component library set. Even this
one has some flaws.
Since you want to achieve the maximum vacuum force, the
area is only one factor to consider. The flatness, or
better yet, the smoothness of the touching surfaces
(component AND nozzle) play an important role. It is not a
case that a little nozzle with plastic cap on the tip may
end up doing a better job, than one bigger without.

Ivan

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2