TECHNET Archives

June 2006

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 Jun 2006 10:18:55 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
After reading all the articles on Lead-Free backwards capability with
Lead-Free BGA's I'm confused.   It is stated that Lead-Free BGA's are
not backwards compatible because of there high temp solder balls not
becoming liquidus when using SnPb solder, the interconnect is considered
too brittle and prone to cracking.  Isn't this true for CBGA's having
the same issue?  Why was it acceptable for CBGA's with SnPb solder but
not for PBGA's?

 

Your thought's 

 

 

 

Scott Lefebvre 


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2