TECHNET Archives

May 2006

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Fri, 26 May 2006 13:22:10 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (130 lines)
Hi Ioan,
Since what we are most woried about is surviving soldering, a
solderfloat test is what is best. While either IST and HATS tests on
coupons can give you basic behavior in terms of long-term reliability,
and some of that info can be useful for an assessmnet of LF-soldering
survivability, neither of them normally tests to soldering T's--perhaps
they could be pushed there, however.
Werner

-----Original Message-----
From: Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Fri, 26 May 2006 12:07:04 -0400
Subject: Re: [TN] Rohs Weeeeeee board material

   Yes,

I kinda got lost in my day to day worries and hit send too soon.

So one concern is getting good boards consistently and Richard is on
the money.

Another concern is if the laminate is OK, will the MLB construction be
lead-free
capable too? There was a thread a while back mentioning something about
designs
that would not be that suited for lead-free boards, can't remember
well, but
things about the copper planes have been briefly mentioned. So IMHO,
capable
laminate does not equate capable boards. What tests can confirm the
capability
of a full PCB structure?

Thanks,

Ioan

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Stadem, Richard D.
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 11:56 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Rohs Weeeeeee board material


That is the purpose of a thorough process/procedures audit done
periodically to ensure the material received is going to be good.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tempea, Ioan
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 10:50 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Rohs Weeeeeee board material

Hi,

I guess we have a good idea now of the difficulties in specifying and
manufacturing lead-free capable PCBs. The next question that comes to my
mind is how are we going to assess if the PCBs that are well speced are
what we expect?

I mean, the spec can be OK, whether perfect IPC-4010 slash sheets are
developed, or STII is implanted. But the manufacturer might still use
expired prepregs, they can have lamination problems, and so on.

What tests shall a contract manufacturer or OEM with no in-house testing
capability impose, in order to have the confidence that they receive
what they specified?

Thanks,

Ioan

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2