TECHNET Archives

May 2006

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 18 May 2006 08:16:38 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (73 lines)
Hi Werner!

Lord knows that you have probably forgot more than I'll ever know, and I
respect you and your vast knowledge and experience. But this one time
I'm going beg to differ on one of those "Urban Myths"...

I do know, from experience, that a 2% silver will help reduce, if not
eliminate tombstones, I've seen it work. There were two assemblies in
the very recent past that I have experience with. On one assembly, we
had unbalanced traces on 0402's on the backside that would tombstone
constantly. When I would use the 2% silver solderpaste, the tombstoning
would be be completely eliminated. We might have seen 1 or 2 on a board
or two every once in a while.

On the other assembly all the 0805 locations had the gap between the
pads laid-out at 1.27mm (.050") and we were getting a lot of
drawbridging and tombstones. First pass yeild was well under 50% at
reflow. With 2% silver paste we had the same results, tombstoning and
drawbridging was practically eliminated.

Trust me, when we would build a board that would exhibit tombstones, I
would first look at paste deposition to make sure the print was good,
then check placement to make sure it was accurate, and then look at my
reflow profile. If after all that I couldn't solve the problem, I would
go to a 2% silver paste and most of the time it would greatly reduce if
not eliminate tombstoning.

Maybe this is good challenge for the "Mythbusters" TV show...hehehe.

-Steve Gregory-

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Werner Engelmaier
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:50 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] 62Sn/36Pb/2Ag solder - too good to be true?

Hi Jeff,
Most of what you list as advantages are 'urban myths.'



Werner

********************************************************************

>Hi everyone,

>Lead free aside, what are the disadvantages of using 62Sn/36Pb/2Ag
solder?  

>I have only ever heard good things about it, such as reduced leaching
of silver and gold, phased reflow, improved joint
>appearance, and a few other things that I can't recall. It is even the
same price as 63/37, and I have used it myself
>with good results.

>However, if it were so universally fantastic, no-one would use
63Sn/37Pb or 60Sn/40Pb, but lots of people do.  What's the >catch?

>Thanks,
>Jeff Brown

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2