TECHNET Archives

May 2006

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Black, Paul" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Black, Paul
Date:
Tue, 16 May 2006 14:45:54 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (224 lines)
I vote with Loa. Silkscreens might not be needed in a perfect process with perfect components, but they come in handy when you are trying to find a part referenced in a schematic, ECO, first pass yield report or part placement error report. It is more convenient to grab a board than wait for support documentation to print.

Thank you, 
Paul Black 
Manufacturing Engineer 
Kronos 



-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of ALLEN, LOA
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 1:10 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Silkscreen on pads


Regarding Silkscreen markings - Unless you are using ARE (Automatic
Rework Equipment) then AOI, ATE, & X-ray are useless and should also be
eliminated.  :)

I vote in favor of leaving silkscreen.

Loa

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Burke
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 9:42 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Silkscreen on pads

Silk screen has been redundant for many years unless you are really
testing
by hand.

Let's face it the machine that places components doesn't use it, the AOI
doesn't need it, the ATE can't see it, and the x-ray machine couldn't
care
less.

Remove it all I say,

John

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Franklin D Asbell
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 8:37 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Silkscreen on pads

I really makes sense considering the only use for silkscreen in these
times
are hand placement of components and perhaps rework or removal and
repair of
said components.

I've talked to many CM's and OEM's who've stated they could care less
about
the symbolization only to the point it affects component placement.

A show of hands now, who would be comfortable with removing symbol
altogether? Pros of such action, Cons of such action?

Franklin

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Whittaker, Dewey
(AZ75)
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 10:31 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Silkscreen on pads

This is one of the reasons I don't allow silkscreen on my expensive
printed wiring boards that have to be soldered. I get grief from
everyone, but I never have to scrap a perfectly good functional printed
wiring board, because of a poorly executed questionable at best
manufacturing aid.
Dewey

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stadem, Richard D.
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 5:55 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Silkscreen on pads

It depends.
If the artwork covers major parts of the pads critical to the strength
of the solder joint, then it needs to be removed. If it is a situation
where a very small amount of the epoxy overlaps onto the very edges of
the pads, it may not be so critical. The boards are not any good if even
one pad has an open.
I know that removing the artwork epoxy can be extremely difficult.
I would suggest the board vendor get on the stick and start a rework
process for removing the epoxy. You should reach an agreement that any
rework on your part is paid for by the board vendor.
After the vendor provides you with 100 of the reworked pwbs, build them
up and see how they solder before accepting any more.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Black, Paul
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 7:46 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Silkscreen on pads

Hi Fellow TechNetters,

I am expecting a fabbed board for our first leadfree production build
next month and have just been informed by the supplier that the artwork
contained silkscreen on quite a few of the solderable SMT pads. They
didn't catch it in time, so now they are asking is we could accept the
boards (qty = 1000) this one time. My PCB spec does not allow silkscreen
on any solderable surface, so I could reject the boards, but my concern
is that there may not be enough time to have more boards fabricated in
time for this build. I know that the boards wouldn't be acceptable per
IPC-A-610, but does anyone have any experience with this situation and
the best way to handle it?

Thank you,
Paul Black
Manufacturing Engineer
Kronos

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2