IPC-600-6012 Archives

May 2006

IPC-600-6012@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Combined Forum of D-33a and 7-31a Subcommittees)
Date:
Wed, 31 May 2006 07:59:42 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines)
I'm curious what everyone's thoughts are regarding relevancy of IPC 6012
Table 4-4 Bond Strength (IPC-TM-650 2.4.21) testing are? Wouldn't peel
strength (IPC-TM-650 2.4.8) testing be a better test to perform?  Or at a
minimum, change the test to include smt lands instead of unsupported holes.



Franklin

ATOM RSS1 RSS2