TECHNET Archives

April 2006

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Brooks,Bill" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Brooks,Bill
Date:
Fri, 14 Apr 2006 15:05:15 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (91 lines)
They have a document called ANGEN034B.pdf that talks about mounting
considerations but I truly wondered about the survivability of the part
after reading all the cautions...





http://tinyurl.com/la2rw <http://tinyurl.com/la2rw>





I wish there was a product out there I could look at that used this device
so I had some feeling for the long term robustness of the assembly...



Thanks for your take on the solder compliancy issue... I tend to agree.

Perhaps different package is a better choice... I may recommend that on
Monday.





Best regards,



Bill Brooks - KG6VVP
PCB Design Engineer, C.I.D.+, C.I.I.
Tel: (760)597-1500 Ext 3772 Fax: (760)597-1510
Datron World Communications, Inc.
_______________________________________
San Diego Chapter of the IPC Designers Council
Communications Officer, Web Manager
 <http://dcchapters.ipc.org/SanDiego/> http://dcchapters.ipc.org/SanDiego/
 <http://pcbwizards.com> http://pcbwizards.com

-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 1:22 PM
To: [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Mounting the Mitsubishi RD07MVS1 Surface Mount SLP package



I wrote earlier:
Hi Nill,
Could not locate a data sheet on Mitsubishi MOSFET RD07MVS1 at the given
website: http://www.mitsubishichips.com/Global/index.html.
Found a reliability section "III. FAILURE MECHANISMS OF SEMICONDUCTOR
DEVICES". However, this section does not give you much confidence. For one,
they use
Norris-Landzberg [many Japanese companies use it for some unfathonable
reason]
even so it has been clearly shown [by IBM no less shortly after the initial
Norris-Landzberg paper publication] that it does not work for solder,
because
it cannot account for dwell time effects. For another, they report results
from
testing to low T-extremes from -40 to -100C [!?], and show failures as early
as 30 cycles [!?].
None of this gives me a warm, fuzzy feeling.
Werner

After seeing the data sheet at <http://tinyurl.com/fpgqa>, showing a ceramic
device dissipating 50 W, being ~6X5 mm in size , and having no provision for
solder attachment with any kind of compliancy, i not on have no 'warm, fuzzy
feeling', but a lump of ice in my stomach.
If you use this devicxe in an operating environment with some thermal cyclic
loading, you are assured premature SJ-failures.

Werner




---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2