TECHNET Archives

March 2006

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Crepeau, Phil (Space Technology)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Crepeau, Phil (Space Technology)
Date:
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 07:39:32 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (128 lines)
hi,

this is pretty fuzzy to me, but it seems to me that there was (early
1970's) an electroless nickel/phosphorus and electroless nickel/boron
finish that was touted as being solderable.  could this be enjoying a
lead-free renaissance?

phil

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Barmuta, Mike
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 7:15 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Nickel Lead Finish

Hi Ken: Yes you should be concerned. As others have said Ni can be very
difficult to solder to. We've been down this Ni final finish road
before. In one case we had to tin the leads to get acceptable results,
in another we changed suppliers to get the finish we wanted.

What type of flux are you using in your solderpaste for the SM assembly
process? If it's no-clean you will probably have trouble. If it's WS
then you "might have a chance. However in either case it will require
longer dwell times above liquidious. 

Are you sure the supplier will not be putting a solderable finish over
the nickel? If possible I would specify a matte tin over Ni finish. This
would provide much better solderability, still be RoHS compliant for the
component manufacturer and the lead in your solder would prevent whisker
formation. 
The only issue may be acceptance of a pure tin finish from your
customers in aerospace. If they won't accept it then change to a
component supplier that can give you the finish you want. 

                                                	
	
Regards
	
Michael Barmuta
	
Staff Engineer
	
Fluke Corp
	
Everett WA
	
425-446-6076



-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bloomquist, Ken
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 6:11 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Nickel Lead Finish

We were just notified by one of our capacitor manufacturers that they
were going lead free and their replacement finish will be nickel. These
are surface mount parts.

If my memory serves we had trouble soldering nickel leads some years ago
on some TO-5 parts.

We are a class 3 manufacturer and will continue to use lead in our
solder. Should we be concerned about the solderability of the nickel
lead finishes?

Thanks,

KennyB

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing
per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended only for the addressee.
Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance on the
contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may constitute a
violation of law.  If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
the sender immediately by responding to this e-mail, and delete the
message from your system.  If you have any questions about this e-mail
please notify the sender immediately.

Ce message (ainsi que les eventuelles pieces jointes) est exclusivement
adresse au destinataire et contient des informations confidentielles. La
copie, la communication ou la distribution du contenu de ce message sans
l'accord prealable de l'expediteur sont strictement interdits et peuvent
constituer un delit. Si vous n'etes pas destinataire de ce message,
merci de le detruire et d'avertir l'expediteur. Si vous avez des
questions se rapportant a ce courrier electronique, merci de bien
vouloir notifier l'expediteur immediatement.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2