TECHNET Archives

March 2006

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Cheryl Johnson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Cheryl Johnson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:47:34 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (68 lines)
Many discrete components (Kemet, Rohm) have been lead free for over 10
years.  So nothing has changed in there parts.
Is there anyone from these industries out there who cares to comment?

Sincerely,
-----------------------------------
Cheryl Johnson, C.I.D.+
Manager
ExcelStor US Office, Engineering Services
Email: [log in to unmask]
Tel: (303) 684-7291
Fax: (303) 684-7268
Mobile: (303) 809-5815
-----------------------------------


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of - Bogert
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 4:46 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Seeking date that part manufacturers started eliminating
lead from part finishes


March 23, 2006

Folks, my understanding is that about 50% of the electronic part
manufacturers have been eliminating Pb from their part finishes without also
changing their part numbers.  I am concerned that because of this, we may
inadvertently be getting lead-free parts and mixing these with lead-bearing
parts.  Concerns are possible tin-whiskers (since pure tin is sometimes used
in lieu of Pb for finishes) and solder joint issues when soldering lead-free
using Sn63 solder.

We have a lot of delivered equipment that I am trying to determine if we
could have these issues.  One way to bound the problem would be to determine
a date by when most part manufacturers starting phasing out Pb from their
part finishes.  Knowing this date, we may be able to accept equipment
manufactured prior to this date with minimum risk.  One possible date may be
the date RoHS started.

Do you folks know of a date that would give me a warm fuzzy that equipment
delivered prior to this date should not be subject to the
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
lead-free issues?

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2