TECHNET Archives

March 2006

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 10 Mar 2006 08:46:27 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (101 lines)
Don,

I'll take a crack at this one having lived through the qualification process
twice. I had to do this for an aerospace manufacturer (circa 1993-1996),
getting customer process certification from the Navy and NASA...

To prove that the cleaning process was repeatable and provides good cleaning
results, we had to perform a series of tests above and beyond using an
omegameter. We provided data to our customer using Ionic Chromatography,
SIR, and FTIR on the effectiveness, and the types and levels of ionic and
non-ionic contamination on hardware after cleaning. In addition, we provided
data sheets on how we planned to control the process. Using an aqueous
cleaning process, that included how often we monitored the DI Water
resistivity and solution concentration and the corrective action when the
process went out of control. Measuring water temperature and the wash /
rinse / drying duration are additional variables which have to documented
and monitored. If a saponifier or surfactant is used, you should check their
MSDS and Process Data Sheets to assure that the material is used properly.

Depending on your requirements, you may also want if the process is a manual
process or an automated process. I'm assuming that it is automated, but if
it is manual, then you have to determine the quality of operator training.

Assuming that your supplier properly implemented the aqueous cleaning
process, then the hardware should be coming out with cleanliness levels ~
1-2 uG NaCL / sq. in. This is well below the IPC limits specified in
J-STD-001, and if you want to go WAY back, the MIL-STD's and NASA
specifications. With good process control, the aqueous cleaning process
should work in an aerospace application.

If there are any questions or comments, call me off line.

Hope this helps.

Good Luck.


Lee Whiteman
Senior Manufacturing Engineer
American Competitiveness Institute
E-Mail: [log in to unmask]
Ph: (610) 362-1200 x208
Fax: (610) 362-1290

This message is for informational purposes only and does not supersede,
modify, or create any agreements with ACI. Information contained in this
message does not bind ACI or its affiliates to any commitment, either
express or implied, unless ratified in writing by an authorized
representative.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Donald Vischulis
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 5:59 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Cleaning Qualification Question

All

I've been assigned the task of determining if a supplier's current cleaning
process is robust or if additional testing is required to be able to say
that the product is clean enough to provide years of field use.  The board
is a 2-sided Class 3 assembly (95% SMT) with one BGA and about 1500 other
components. The assembly is soldered with a water soluble flux, it's cleaned
in a batch cleaner with DI water, and is conformal coated.  The current
manufacturer is using and Omega meter to verify the cleanliness of the board
after cleaning.

My questions:

Is this process good enough to provide a reliable product in an aircraft
application?
If not what guidance is available to determine what level of process
qualification is needed to answer question #1?

Any help is really appreciated.

Don Vischulis

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the
BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet
NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send
e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of
previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web
site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2