TECHNET Archives

February 2006

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Phil Zarrow <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:49:17 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (52 lines)
 
Hi  all, 
Steve  presented an interesting situation regarding the cost of the 
replacement parts  for his printer.  Being a fellow  veteran “equipment guy” he 
accurately points out that supporting and older  machine is a bit more expensive.  I 
 looked in the situation with the front door cover strut and, apparently, as 
a  result of time, inflation and, most importantly, lower volume purchases 
(since  that part is no longer used in current equipment), the price has gone up. 
 As one of my hobbies is keeping some  older sports cars alive and running, I 
have run into this syndrome quite a bit  and empathize with both sides.    
The Edge  Clamp Foil dilemma boggled my mind.  I had  to look into this - 
inquiring minds want to know.  As it turns out,  one of my clients recently 
undertook some upgrade work to their older DEK  printer.  I inquired about the  
prices they encountered and the aforementioned clamps were $217 (where, as Steve  
mentioned, they were previously $184).  Not too bad.  However, a complete 
upgrade from the  original system to a the quick change clamp system cost ( a 
year ago) $1284.  That’s more like it.  (Again, that was a year ago, though, and  
I suspect the conversion costs even more now – again lower demand and volume  
purchased, not to mention our fragile dollar). And at least they were in  
stock!  K Jaworenko's experience with having to wait 32 weeks for  replacement 
parts from an equipment supplier is deplorable. 
Maybe I’m too  altruistic, but I really don’t think (and hope) that the more 
reputable  equipment manufacturers have to resort to gouging on spares to 
coerce us to buy  newer machines. Certainly, some seem to have their acts 
together better  than others.  Of course our  experiences, both in use and support 
with these manufacturers will influence our  next purchasing decision just as 
much as their specifications will and they are  aware of that.  But, speaking as 
 someone who spent a lot of time on the equipment side, supporting older 
machines  both in terms of spares and retrofits is a tough part of the  business. 
One further  suggestion when contemplating a used piece of equipment and 
calling the OEM's  field service department and chatting with a field service 
tech.   Besides being the guys who actually work on the machines, most field 
service  techs are opinionated and tell it like it is - good or bad.  (Sometimes  
they can be the "anit-salesman").  To use my automotive analogy again, if  
you're considering buying a used automobile, who better than a mechanic to tell  
you what's good and what to watch out for?  Again, caveat emptor,  indeed. 
Phil  Zarrow 
ITM  Consulting 
Durham,  NH  USA
_www.ITMconsulting.org_ (http://www.ITMconsulting.org)  


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2