DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

January 2006

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Designers Council Forum)
Date:
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:28:18 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (71 lines)
Also, if you are doing it for UL approval, you need 5mm spacing at 500V.

Regards,
Steve Smith, C.I.D.
Product Engineer

Staco Energy Products Co. 
Web Site: www.stacoenergy.com 
& www.stacopower.com 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: DesignerCouncil [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On 
> Behalf Of Gary
> Ferrari
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 4:29 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [DC] Electrical spacing in IPC2221 spec
> 
> 
> Ron,
> 
> You are not quite correct in your assumptions. First, the "A" side of
> the table is for component lead terminations, not lands and 
> conductors.
> The lands, as well as conductors, fall on the "B" side of the table.
> That said, the B2 value would be higher than the A6 value since there
> are always traces of contamination on the surface of the board which
> will affect the isolation characteristics. Whereas the component leads
> face air as an insulator and will not see the full effects of surface
> contamination.
> 
> Hope this clears it up some.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>   Gary Ferrari
> Ferrari Technical Services
> 860-350-9300
> 
> Ron O wrote:
> > Can anyone help interpret the IPC2221 Electrical Conductor 
> Spacing chart
> > 6-1 (pg 39)?
> > I have a pcb requirement of 500V spacing between nets. Board is FR4
> > 2layer, soldermask both sides, no conformal coating. Based 
> on the chart,
> > I need a B4 spacing (0.8mm) for the soldermasked conductors 
> and an A6
> > spacing (1.5mm) for the exposed pad areas (I'm assuming 
> this is pad to
> > pad spacing not pad to coated trace spacing).
> >
> > Is my interpretation correct so far?
> >
> > Next question is the column B2, which applies to uncoated (no SM or
> > conformal) and has a spacing requirement of 2.5mm. So this 
> would be bare
> > trace to bare trace. Why would this spacing need to be 
> greater than bare
> > pad to bare pad (the A6 rating)?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2