TECHNET Archives

December 2005

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Charlie McMahon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Charlie McMahon <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:58:09 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (137 lines)
Hello Valerie:

Would it be fair to encourage the laminate suppliers to place within their
respective specifications sheets whether the material in question can with
stand the increased solder-float as per UL?
In addition, should not the maximum exposure temp (Td) be higher than 288 to
allow for vagaries of individual processing?

What is your view?

Charlie McMahon

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Valerie St.Cyr
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 4:51 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Qualification of the Pb-free capable
manufacturers

Inge,

This appears to be a presentation from UL showing what services they 
provide to 
the electronics industry. Reading between the lines, it appears that they 
are saying
that they are increasing their solder float temperature to 288C as a 
response to
"industry suggested" - they, UL, did not come up with that number.

There is nothing special about 288C other than it is 550F which is 10% 
higher
than 500F, which was the solder float temperature to establish PTH 
reliability
in concert with IPC-6012. I don't know the origin of the setting of 500F 
value.

So, 288C is 10% higher than 260C, and if you believe that LF assembly 
temps will
be up to 260C, then you might want to test to 288C to determine if you 
have any
margin in the design/material/fabrication produced PCB.

Werner,

Very few, in fact none so far, of the older or new materials that we have 
tested
can get to T288 => 45 minutes; we haven't even tried T320. But unless it 
is
polyimide I have a hard time believing it will make =>25 mins. The only 
caveat
is that the test is not as "standardized" as having a standard would have 
you
believe!

Regards,

Valerie





Ingemar Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]> 
Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
12/14/2005 05:07 PM
Please respond to
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to
Ingemar Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>


To
[log in to unmask]
cc

Subject
[TN] SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Qualification of the Pb-free capable manufacturers




http://www.ul.com/pwb/LeadfreeAndPresentationProceedings.pdf
page 38. what do they point at then?

Inge

-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] För Werner Engelmaier
Skickat: den 14 december 2005 20:56
Till: [log in to unmask]
Ämne: Re: [TN] SV: [TN] Qualification of the Pb-free capable
manufacturers

Hi Inge,
I do not know abput UL's proposal, but there are some defined
conditions: T260, T288, T300 & T320 defining temperatures at 
which time to delamination is measured up to 45 minutes--I also 
do not know who came up with this measure [288°C???]. Standard 
FR-4 has a T260 of less thasn 30 minutes and a T288 of less 
than 5 minutes, whereas a high Tg/highTd material has a T288 
of 45 minutes and a T320 of about 25 minutes.

Werner





---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------


-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.1/206 - Release Date: 12/16/2005

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2